4.8 Article

Computer-aided discovery of a metal-organic framework with superior oxygen uptake

期刊

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
卷 9, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-018-03892-8

关键词

-

资金

  1. Royal Society through a University Research Fellowship
  2. European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union's Horizon research and innovation programme (NanoMOFdeli) [ERC-2016-COG 726380]
  3. UK Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council, EPSRC [EP/L015889/1, EP/H018301/1]
  4. Wellcome Trust [3-3249/Z/16/Z, 089703/Z/09/Z]
  5. UK Medical Research Council, MRC [MR/K015850/1, MR/K02292X/1]
  6. MedImmune
  7. Infinitus (China) Ltd.
  8. Cambridge High Performance Computing Cluster, Darwin
  9. U.S. Department of Energy [DE-FG02-08ER15967]
  10. BBSRC [BB/H023917/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  11. EPSRC [EP/H018301/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  12. MRC [G0902243, MR/K015850/1, MR/K02292X/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Current advances in materials science have resulted in the rapid emergence of thousands of functional adsorbent materials in recent years. This clearly creates multiple opportunities for their potential application, but it also creates the following challenge: how does one identify the most promising structures, among the thousands of possibilities, for a particular application? Here, we present a case of computer-aided material discovery, in which we complete the full cycle from computational screening of metal-organic framework materials for oxygen storage, to identification, synthesis and measurement of oxygen adsorption in the top-ranked structure. We introduce an interactive visualization concept to analyze over 1000 unique structure-property plots in five dimensions and delimit the relationships between structural properties and oxygen adsorption performance at different pressures for 2932 already-synthesized structures. We also report a world-record holding material for oxygen storage, UMCM-152, which delivers 22.5% more oxygen than the best known material to date, to the best of our knowledge.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据