4.8 Article

Self-hydrogenated shell promoting photocatalytic H-2 evolution on anatase TiO2

期刊

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
卷 9, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-018-05144-1

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2016YFB0700700]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11704015, 51621003, 11374028, U1330112, 51572016, 5171101810, U1530401]
  3. Beijing Municipal Commission of Education [KZ201310005002]
  4. NSC [96-2628-E-007-017-MY3, 101-2120-M-007-012-CC1]
  5. MOST [105-2221-E-007-023-MY3, 104-2221-E-007-067-MY3]
  6. DoE-BES, Division of Chemical Sciences, Geosciences and Biosciences [DE-SC0007347]
  7. 1000-planhh
  8. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
  9. Special Program for Applied Research on Super Computation of the NSFC-Guangdong Joint Fund [U1501501]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

As one of the most important photocatalysts, TiO2 has triggered broad interest and intensive studies for decades. Observation of the interfacial reactions between water and TiO2 at microscopic scale can provide key insight into the mechanisms of photocatalytic processes. Currently, experimental methodologies for characterizing photocatalytic reactions of anatase TiO2 are mostly confined to water vapor or single molecule chemistry. Here, we investigate the photocatalytic reaction of anatase TiO2 nanoparticles in water using liquid environmental transmission electron microscopy. A self-hydrogenated shell is observed on the TiO2 surface before the generation of hydrogen bubbles. First-principles calculations suggest that this shell is formed through subsurface diffusion of photo-reduced water protons generated at the aqueous TiO2 interface, which promotes photocatalytic hydrogen evolution by reducing the activation barrier for H-2 (H-H bond) formation. Experiments confirm that the self-hydrogenated shell contains reduced titanium ions, and its thickness can increase to several nanometers with increasing UV illuminance.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据