4.8 Article

Oxidation-specific epitopes restrain bone formation

期刊

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
卷 9, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-018-04047-5

关键词

-

资金

  1. Biomedical Laboratory Research and Development Service of the Veterans Administration Office of Research and Development [I01 BX000514]
  2. National Institutes of Health [P01 AG-13918]
  3. University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences Tobacco Funds
  4. Translational Research Institute [239 G150893-01, 1UL1 RR-029884]
  5. University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences [271 G1-51451-99]
  6. NIH [HL P01-088093, HL 119828, HL R35-135737, HL P01 136275, P20GM125503]
  7. NATIONAL HEART, LUNG, AND BLOOD INSTITUTE [P01HL136275] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  8. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF GENERAL MEDICAL SCIENCES [P20GM125503] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  9. Veterans Affairs [I01BX001405] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Atherosclerosis and osteoporosis are epidemiologically linked and oxidation specific epitopes (OSEs), such as phosphocholine (PC) of oxidized phospholipids (PC-OxPL) and malondialdehyde (MDA), are pathogenic in both. The proatherogenic effects of OSEs are opposed by innate immune antibodies. Here we show that high-fat diet (HFD)-induced bone loss is attenuated in mice expressing a single chain variable region fragment of the IgM E06 (E06-scFv) that neutralizes PC-OxPL, by increasing osteoblast number and stimulating bone formation. Similarly, HFD-induced bone loss is attenuated in mice expressing IK17-scFv, which neutralizes MDA. Notably, E06-scFv also increases bone mass in mice fed a normal diet. Moreover, the levels of anti-PC IgM decrease in aged mice. We conclude that OSEs, whether produced chronically or increased by HFD, restrain bone formation, and that diminished defense against OSEs may contribute to age-related bone loss. Anti-OSEs, therefore, may represent a novel therapeutic approach against osteoporosis and atherosclerosis simultaneously.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据