4.8 Article

Fe-N system at high pressure reveals a compound featuring polymeric nitrogen chains

期刊

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
卷 9, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-018-05143-2

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Science Foundation-Earth Sciences [EAR-1634415]
  2. Department of Energy-GeoSciences [DE-FG02-94ER14466]
  3. DOE Office of Science [DE-AC02-06CH11357]
  4. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) [DU 954-11/1, DU 393-10/1]
  5. Federal Ministry of Education and Research, Germany (BMBF) [5K16WC1]
  6. Swedish Research Council [2015-04391]
  7. VINN Excellence Center Functional Nanoscale Materials (FunMat-2) [2016-05156]
  8. Swedish Government Strategic Research Areas in Materials Science on Functional Materials at Linkoping University [2009-00971]
  9. Swedish e-Science Research Centre (SeRC)
  10. Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation [14.Y26.31.0005, K2-2017-080]
  11. RFBR [16-02-00797]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Poly-nitrogen compounds have been considered as potential high energy density materials for a long time due to the large number of energetic N-N or N=N bonds. In most cases high nitrogen content and stability at ambient conditions are mutually exclusive, thereby making the synthesis of such materials challenging. One way to stabilize such compounds is the application of high pressure. Here, through a direct reaction between Fe and N-2 in a laser-heated diamond anvil cell, we synthesize three ironnitrogen compounds Fe3N2, FeN2 and FeN4. Their crystal structures are revealed by single-crystal synchrotron X-ray diffraction. Fe3N2, synthesized at 50 GPa, is isostructural to chromium carbide Cr3C2. FeN2 has a marcasite structure type and features covalently bonded dinitrogen units in its crystal structure. FeN4, synthesized at 106 GPa, features polymeric nitrogen chains of [N-4(2-)](n) units. Based on results of structural studies and theoretical analysis, [N-4(2-)](n) units in this compound reveal catena-poly[tetraz-1-ene-1,4-diyl] anions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据