4.8 Article

Recurrent rearrangements of FOS and FOSB define osteoblastoma

期刊

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
卷 9, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-018-04530-z

关键词

-

资金

  1. Wellcome Trust
  2. Skeletal Cancer Action Trust UK
  3. Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Trust
  4. Rosetrees Trust
  5. National Institute for Health Research
  6. UCLH Biomedical Research Centre
  7. UCL Experimental Cancer Centre
  8. Francis Crick Institute, from Cancer Research UK [FC001202]
  9. UK Medical Research Council [FC001202]
  10. Wellcome Trust [FC001202]
  11. NIH [P50 CA140146-01, P30 CA008748]
  12. European Union's Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation programme [MSCA 703594-DECODE]
  13. European Union's Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation programme postdoctoral fellowship [MSCA 747852-SIOMICS]
  14. Wellcome Trust Intermediate Clinical Research Fellowship
  15. St. Baldrick's Foundation Robert J. Arceci International Innovation Award
  16. Wellcome Trust Senior Clinical Research Fellowship
  17. CRUK Clinician Scientist Fellowship
  18. Research Foundation - Flanders, FWO Postdoctoral Fellowship
  19. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE [P30CA008748, P50CA140146] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The transcription factor FOS has long been implicated in the pathogenesis of bone tumours, following the discovery that the viral homologue, v-fos, caused osteosarcoma in laboratory mice. However, mutations of FOS have not been found in human bone-forming tumours. Here, we report recurrent rearrangement of FOS and its paralogue, FOSB, in the most common benign tumours of bone, osteoblastoma and osteoid osteoma. Combining whole-genome DNA and RNA sequences, we find rearrangement of FOS in five tumours and of FOSB in one tumour. Extending our findings into a cohort of 55 cases, using FISH and immunohistochemistry, provide evidence of ubiquitous mutation of FOS or FOSB in osteoblastoma and osteoid osteoma. Overall, our findings reveal a human bone tumour defined by mutations of FOS and FOSB.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据