4.8 Article

Cx26 drives self-renewal in triple-negative breast cancer via interaction with NANOG and focal adhesion kinase

期刊

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
卷 9, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-018-02938-1

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [CA191263, NS089641, NS083629, CA157948]
  2. NIH SIG grant [1S10OD019972-01]
  3. NIH/NCI [R00CA1606638]
  4. American Cancer Society [ACS127951-RSG-15-025-01-CSM]
  5. Komen [CCR15332826]
  6. Ohio Cancer Research Associates
  7. DOD Breast Cancer Research Program [BC150596]
  8. Clinical and Translational Science Collaborative of Cleveland [UL1TR000439]
  9. Case Comprehensive Cancer Center [P30 CA043703]
  10. Cleveland Clinic VeloSano Bike Race
  11. Sontag Foundation
  12. American Cancer Society
  13. Blast GBM
  14. Case Comprehensive Cancer Center
  15. CDMRP [BC150596, 893164] Funding Source: Federal RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Tumors adapt their phenotypes during growth and in response to therapies through dynamic changes in cellular processes. Connexin proteins enable such dynamic changes during development, and their dysregulation leads to disease states. The gap junction communication channels formed by connexins have been reported to exhibit tumor-suppressive functions, including in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). However, we find that connexin 26 (Cx26) is elevated in self-renewing cancer stem cells (CSCs) and is necessary and sufficient for their maintenance. Cx26 promotes CSC self-renewal by forming a signaling complex with the pluripotency transcription factor NANOG and focal adhesion kinase (FAK), resulting in NANOG stabilization and FAK activation. This FAK/NANOG-containing complex is not formed in mammary epithelial or luminal breast cancer cells. These findings challenge the paradigm that connexins are tumor suppressors in TNBC and reveal a unique function for Cx26 in regulating the core self-renewal signaling that controls CSC maintenance.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据