4.8 Article

Molecular basis of an agarose metabolic pathway acquired by a human intestinal symbiont

期刊

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
卷 9, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-018-03366-x

关键词

-

资金

  1. Alberta Innovates BioSolutions [BIOFS026]
  2. Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada
  3. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada [FRN 0355, FRN 462163-2014]
  4. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
  5. National Research Council Canada
  6. Canadian Institutes of Health Research
  7. Province of Saskatchewan, Western Economic Diversification Canada
  8. University of Saskatchewan
  9. DOE Office of Biological and Environmental Research
  10. National Institutes of Health, National Center for Research Resources, Biomedical Technology Program [P41RR001209]
  11. National Institute of General Medical Sciences

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In red algae, the most abundant principal cell wall polysaccharides are mixed galactan agars, of which agarose is a common component. While bioconversion of agarose is predominantly catalyzed by bacteria that live in the oceans, agarases have been discovered in microorganisms that inhabit diverse terrestrial ecosystems, including human intestines. Here we comprehensively define the structure-function relationship of the agarolytic pathway from the human intestinal bacterium Bacteroides uniformis (Bu) NP1. Using recombinant agarases from Bu NP1 to completely depolymerize agarose, we demonstrate that a non-agarolytic Bu strain can grow on GAL released from agarose. This relationship underscores that rare nutrient utilization by intestinal bacteria is facilitated by the acquisition of highly specific enzymes that unlock inaccessible carbohydrate resources contained within unusual polysaccharides. Intriguingly, the agarolytic pathway is differentially distributed throughout geographically distinct human microbiomes, reflecting a complex historical context for agarose consumption by human beings.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据