4.8 Article

Enhanced efficacy of combined temozolomide and bromodomain inhibitor therapy for gliomas using targeted nanoparticles

期刊

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
卷 9, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-018-04315-4

关键词

-

资金

  1. Koch Institute Frontier Research Program
  2. Koch Institute Quinquennial Cancer Research Fellowship
  3. Bridge Project
  4. Koch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research at MIT
  5. Dana-Farber/Harvard Cancer Center
  6. NSF
  7. Deutscher Akademischer Austusch Dienst (German Academic Exchange Service)
  8. Koch Institute Frontier Award
  9. NIH [R01-ES015339, R35-ES028374]
  10. STARR Consortium grant
  11. Charles and Marjorie Holloway Foundation
  12. Koch Institute Clinical Investigator Award
  13. Burroughs Wellcome Career Award for Medical Scientists
  14. Marble Center for Nanomedicine at MIT
  15. Koch Institute Support (core) Grant from the National Cancer Institute [P30-CA14051]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Effective treatment for glioblastoma (GBM) is limited by the presence of the blood-brain barrier (BBB) and rapid resistance to single agent therapies. To address these issues, we developed a transferrin-functionalized nanoparticle (Tf-NP) that can deliver dual combination therapies. Using intravital imaging, we show the ability of Tf-NPs to traverse intact BBB in mice as well as achieve direct tumor binding in two intracranial orthotopic models of GBM. Treatment of tumor-bearing mice with Tf-NPs loaded with temozolomide and the bromodomain inhibitor JQ1 leads to increased DNA damage and apoptosis that correlates with a 1.5-to 2-fold decrease in tumor burden and corresponding increase in survival compared to equivalent free-drug dosing. Immunocompetent mice treated with Tf-NP-loaded drugs also show protection from the effects of systemic drug toxicity, demonstrating the preclinical potential of this nanoscale platform to deliver novel combination therapies to gliomas and other central nervous system tumors.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据