4.8 Article

Obligatory and facilitative allelic variation in the DNA methylome within common disease-associated loci

期刊

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
卷 9, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-017-01586-1

关键词

-

资金

  1. Wellcome Trust [081878/Z/06/Z]
  2. European Community's Seventh Framework Programme (FP7)
  3. National Institute for Health Research (NIHR)
  4. King's College London
  5. European Research Council [250157]
  6. BGI
  7. MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit
  8. EpiGen Global Research Consortium
  9. Wellcome Trust [081878/Z/06/Z] Funding Source: Wellcome Trust
  10. MRC [MC_UP_A620_1017, MC_UU_12011/4] Funding Source: UKRI
  11. European Research Council (ERC) [250157] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Integrating epigenetic data with genome-wide association study (GWAS) results can reveal disease mechanisms. The genome sequence itself also shapes the epigenome, with CpG density and transcription factor binding sites (TFBSs) strongly encoding the DNA methylome. Therefore, genetic polymorphism impacts on the observed epigenome. Furthermore, large genetic variants alter epigenetic signal dosage. Here, we identify DNA methylation variability between GWAS-SNP risk and non-risk haplotypes. In three subsets comprising 3128 MeDIPseq peripheral-blood DNA methylomes, we find 7173 consistent and functionally enriched Differentially Methylated Regions. 36.8% can be attributed to common non-SNP genetic variants. CpG-SNPs, as well as facilitative TFBS-motifs, are also enriched. Highlighting their functional potential, CpG-SNPs strongly associate with allele-specific DNase-I hypersensitivity sites. Our results demonstrate strong DNA methylation allelic differences driven by obligatory or facilitative genetic effects, with potential direct or regional diseaserelated repercussions. These allelic variations require disentangling from pure tissue-specific modifications, may influence array studies, and imply underestimated population variability in current reference epigenomes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据