4.4 Article

Expression patterns of E2F transcription factors and their potential prognostic roles in breast cancer

期刊

ONCOLOGY LETTERS
卷 15, 期 6, 页码 9216-9230

出版社

SPANDIDOS PUBL LTD
DOI: 10.3892/ol.2018.8514

关键词

E2F; breast cancer; bioinformatics; the cancer genome atlas; oncomine; Kaplan-Meier plotter; prognosis

类别

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81472475, 81102007]
  2. Chongqing Science and Technology Commission [cstc2016jcyjA0313]
  3. Scientific Research Foundation of Chongqing Medical University [201408]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

E2Fs, as a family of pivotal transcription factors, have been implicated in multiple biological functions in human cancer; however, the expression and prognostic significance of E2Fs in breast cancer remains unknown. In the present study, the mRNA expression patterns of E2Fs in breast cancer were investigated with Oncomine and The Cancer Genome Atlas data. Prognostic values of E2Fs for patients with breast cancer were determined using the Kaplan-Meier plotter database. The results strongly indicated that E2F1, E2F2, E2F3, E2F5, E2F7 and E2F8 were overexpressed in patients with breast cancer, whereas E2F4 and E2F6 exhibited no expression difference between patients with cancer and healthy controls. In survival analyses, elevated E2F1, E2F3, E2F5, E2F7 and E2F8 expression levels were significantly associated with lower overall survival, relapse-free survival (RFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) or post-progression survival for patients with breast cancer. Furthermore, high expression of E2F4 indicated improved RFS but reduced DMFS. Subgroup analyses based on four clinicopathological factors further revealed that E2Fs were associated with the prognosis of patients with breast cancer in an estrogen receptor-, progesterone receptor-, human epidermal growth factor 2- and lymph node status-specific manner. These data indicated that E2Fs may serve as promising biomarkers and therapeutic targets for breast cancer.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据