4.4 Article

Potential suppressive effects of theophylline on human rectal cancer SW480 cells in vitro by inhibiting YKL-40 expression

期刊

ONCOLOGY LETTERS
卷 15, 期 5, 页码 7403-7408

出版社

SPANDIDOS PUBL LTD
DOI: 10.3892/ol.2018.8220

关键词

chitinase inhibitor; rectal cancer; chitinase-3-like-1 protein; angiopoietin-2

类别

资金

  1. Science and Technology Department of Sichuan Province [2017JY0116]
  2. Youth Fund from the Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine of Sichuan Province in China [2016Q089]
  3. Synergetic Development Research Center of Sichuan Traditional Chinese Medicine Culture [ZYYWH1613]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Chitinase-3-like-1 protein (YKL-40), a member of the mammalian chitinase-like glycoproteins, serves a key role in the pathogenesis of rectal cancer. The present study examined the antitumor effect of theophylline, a pan-chitinase inhibitor, in rectal cancer in vitro and investigated the mechanism by which it acted. SW480 cell lines were treated with varying theophylline concentrations (10(-2), 10(-3), 10(-4) and 10(-5) mol/l). An MTT assay was used to observe cell proliferation and identify the optimal theophylline concentration. Western blotting was used to analyze YKL-40 expression. The cell cycle distribution of SW480 cell lines treated with theophylline was measured by flow cytometry. The angiopoietin-2 expression level was measured by ELISA. The expression levels of YKL-40 were evidently decreased in theophylline-treated SW480 cell lines. The proliferation of SW480 cells was inhibited following theophylline treatment, which was associated with G(1) phase cell cycle arrest and a decrease in the expression of angiopoietin-2. The mechanism of theophylline action may involve the downregulation of YKL-40 expression, arrest of the cell cycle at G(1) phase and inhibition of angiopoietin-2 expression. These results provide a rationale for the potential use of anti-YKL-40 and anti-angiogenic strategies in treating rectal cancer.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据