4.3 Article

Operating Temperature, Repeatability, and Selectivity of TiO2 Nanotube-Based Acetone Sensor: Influence of Pd and Ni Nanoparticle Modifications

期刊

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TDMR.2015.2455557

关键词

TiO2 nanotubes; Pd modification; Ni modification; optimum temperature; selectivity; repeatability

资金

  1. Indian National Science Academy (INSA) [SP/YSP/81/2013/735, Intl/DFG/2014/1560]
  2. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) [GZ: FE 313/16-1: AOBJ:614734]
  3. COE, TEQIP-II, IIEST Shibpur

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper concerns the tuning of the operating temperatures, selectivity, and repeatability of a resistive acetone sensor based on TiO2 nanotubes (NTs) through surface modifications (of NTs) using Pd and Ni nanoparticles. Three sets of sensor devices, which employ unmodified, Ni-modified, and Pd-modified TiO2 NT arrays as the sensing layer, were tested for acetone detection in the temperature range of 50 degrees C-250 degrees C, targeting 10-1000 ppm. It was found that both the modified (Pd and Ni) sensors offered a lower optimum operating temperature (100 degrees C) compared with its unmodified counterpart (150 degrees C), possibly owing to the requirement of lower activation energy in the case of modified systems. The cross sensitivity toward other interfering species, viz., ethanol, methanol, 2-butanone, and toluene, was investigated. Both the modified sensors were found to offer better selectivity toward acetone than the unmodified sensor. However, the response and selectivity improvement of the modified sensors was achieved at the expense of poor repeatability. Possibly owing to the increased structural defects and the nonidentical oxygen spill over in the repeated cycles, the modified sensors offered relatively poor repeatability. Among the two types of modifications, the Pd-modified sensor offered better response magnitude and transient characteristics (the response time and the recovery time) than the Ni-modified sensor. The underlying mechanism for such improvement has been also highlighted.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据