4.7 Article

The mycotoxin phomoxanthone A disturbs the form and function of the inner mitochondrial membrane

期刊

CELL DEATH & DISEASE
卷 9, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41419-018-0312-8

关键词

-

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [STO 864/3-1, STO 864/4-1, STO 864/5-1, GRK 2158, SFB 974]
  2. Research Committee of the Medical Faculty of the Heinrich Heine University Dusseldorf [22/2015, 02/2015, 37/2015]
  3. Dusseldorf School of Oncology - Comprehensive Cancer Centre Dusseldorf/Deutsche Krebshilfe
  4. Dusseldorf School of Oncology (Medical Faculty of the Heinrich Heine University Dusseldorf)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mitochondria are cellular organelles with crucial functions in the generation and distribution of ATP, the buffering of cytosolic Ca2+ and the initiation of apoptosis. Compounds that interfere with these functions are termed mitochondrial toxins, many of which are derived from microbes, such as antimycin A, oligomycin A, and ionomycin. Here, we identify the mycotoxin phomoxanthone A (PXA), derived from the endophytic fungus Phomopsis longicolla, as a mitochondrial toxin. We show that PXA elicits a strong release of Ca2+ from the mitochondria but not from the ER. In addition, PXA depolarises the mitochondria similarly to protonophoric uncouplers such as CCCP, yet unlike these, it does not increase but rather inhibits cellular respiration and electron transport chain activity. The respiration-dependent mitochondrial network structure rapidly collapses into fragments upon PXA treatment. Surprisingly, this fragmentation is independent from the canonical mitochondrial fission and fusion mediators DRP1 and OPA1, and exclusively affects the inner mitochondrial membrane, leading to cristae disruption, release of pro-apoptotic proteins, and apoptosis. Taken together, our results suggest that PXA is a mitochondrial toxin with a novel mode of action that might prove a useful tool for the study of mitochondrial ion homoeostasis and membrane dynamics.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据