4.6 Article

GTID: A Technique for Physical Device and Device Type Fingerprinting

期刊

出版社

IEEE COMPUTER SOC
DOI: 10.1109/TDSC.2014.2369033

关键词

GTID; device fingerprinting; wireless device fingerprinting; device type fingerprinting

资金

  1. [NSF-CAREER-CNS-0545667 844144]
  2. [DARPA-N10AP20022]
  3. Division Of Computer and Network Systems
  4. Direct For Computer & Info Scie & Enginr [1140230] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this paper, we introduce GTID, a technique that can actively and passively fingerprint wireless devices and their types using wire-side observations in a local network. GTID exploits information that is leaked as a result of heterogeneity in devices, which is a function of different device hardware compositions and variations in devices' clock skew. We apply statistical techniques on network traffic to create unique, reproducible device and device type signatures, and use artificial neural networks (ANNs) for classification. We demonstrate the efficacy of our technique on both an isolated testbed and a live campus network (during peak hours) using a corpus of 37 devices representing a wide range of device classes (e.g., iPads, iPhones, Google Phones, etc.) and traffic types (e.g., Skype, SCP, ICMP, etc.). Our experiments provided more than 300 GB of traffic captures which we used for ANN training and performance evaluation. In order for any fingerprinting technique to be practical, it must be able to detect previously unseen devices (i.e., devices for which no stored signature is available) and must be able to withstand various attacks. GTID is a fingerprinting technique to detect previously unseen devices and to illustrate its resilience under various attacker models. We measure the performance of GTID by considering accuracy, recall, and processing time and also illustrate how it can be used to complement existing security mechanisms (e.g., authentication systems) and to detect counterfeit devices.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据