4.8 Article

An experimental and computational study of CO2 adsorption in the sodalite-type M-BTT (M = Cr, Mn, Fe, Cu) metal-organic frameworks featuring open metal sites

期刊

CHEMICAL SCIENCE
卷 9, 期 20, 页码 4579-4588

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c8sc00971f

关键词

-

资金

  1. Swiss National Science Foundation [PYAPP2_160581]
  2. Swiss Commission for Technology and Innovation (CTI)
  3. National Center of Competence in Research (NCCR) Materials' Revolution: Computational Design and Discovery of Novel Materials (MARVEL) of the Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF)
  4. Center for Gas Separations Relevant to Clean Energy Technologies, an Energy Frontier Research Center - U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Basic Energy Sciences [DE-SC0001015]
  5. National Science Foundation [DGE 1106400]
  6. Office of Science of the U.S. Department of Energy [DE-AC02-05CH11231]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We present a comprehensive investigation of the CO2 adsorption properties of an isostructural series of metal-organic frameworks, M-BTT (M 1/4 Cr, Mn, Fe, Cu; BTT3 = 1/4 1,3,5-benzenetristetrazolate), which exhibit a high density of open metal sites capable of polarizing and binding guest molecules. Coupling gas adsorption measurements with in situ neutron and X-ray diffraction experiments provides molecularlevel insight into the adsorption process and enables rationalization of the observed adsorption isotherms. In particular, structural data confirms that the high initial isosteric heats of CO2 adsorption for the series are directly correlated with the presence of open metal sites and further reveals the positions and orientations of as many as three additional adsorption sites. Density functional theory calculations that include van der Waals dispersion corrections quantitatively support the observed structural features associated with the primary and secondary CO2 binding sites, including CO2 positions and orientations, as well as the experimentally determined isosteric heats of CO2 adsorption.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据