4.6 Article

Deep Learning for Prediction of Obstructive Disease From Fast Myocardial Perfusion SPECT A Multicenter Study

期刊

JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGING
卷 11, 期 11, 页码 1654-1663

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2018.01.020

关键词

convolutional neural network; deep learning; obstructive coronary artery disease; SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging

资金

  1. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute/National Institutes of Health [R01HL089765]
  2. Toshiba America Medical Systems
  3. Advanced Accelerator Applications
  4. Bracco
  5. Spectrum Dynamics
  6. GE Healthcare
  7. Siemens Medical Systems

向作者/读者索取更多资源

OBJECTIVES The study evaluated the automatic prediction of obstructive disease from myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) by deep learning as compared with total perfusion deficit (TPD). BACKGROUND Deep convolutional neural networks trained with a large multicenter population may provide improved prediction of per-patient and per-vessel coronary artery disease from single-photon emission computed tomography MPI. METHODS A total of 1,638 patients (67% men) without known coronary artery disease, undergoing stress Tc-99m-ses-tamibi or tetrofosmin MPI with new generation solid-state scanners in 9 different sites, with invasive coronary angiography performed within 6 months of MPI, were studied. Obstructive disease was defined as >= 70% narrowing of coronary arteries (>= 50% for left main artery). Left ventricular myocardium was segmented using clinical nuclear cardiology software and verified by an expert reader. Stress TPD was computed using sex-and camera-specific normal limits. Deep learning was trained using raw and quantitative polar maps and evaluated for prediction of obstructive stenosis in a stratified 10-fold cross-validation procedure. RESULTS A total of 1,018 (62%) patients and 1,797 of 4,914 (37%) arteries had obstructive disease. Area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve for disease prediction by deep learning was higher than for TPD (per patient: 0.80 vs. 0.78; per vessel: 0.76 vs. 0.73: p < 0.01). With deep learning threshold set to the same specificity as TPD, per-patient sensitivity improved from 79.8% (TPD) to 82.3% (deep learning) (p < 0.05), and per-vessel sensitivity improved from 64.4% (TPD) to 69.8% (deep learning) (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS Deep learning has the potential to improve automatic interpretation of MPI as compared with current clinical methods. (C) 2018 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据