4.7 Article

Constraining stellar assembly and active galactic nucleus feedback at the peak epoch of star formation

期刊

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-3933.2012.01309.x

关键词

galaxies: formation; galaxies: high-redshift; ultraviolet: galaxies

资金

  1. STFC
  2. Large Facilities Capital Fund of BIS
  3. University of Oxford
  4. Clarendon DPhil studentship
  5. Oxford Martin School
  6. STFC [ST/H002456/1, ST/H008896/1, ST/F003110/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  7. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/H002456/1, ST/F003110/1, ST/H008896/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We study stellar assembly and feedback from active galactic nuclei (AGN) around the epoch of peak star formation (1 ?z? 2), by comparing hydrodynamic simulations to rest-frame UVoptical galaxy colours from the Wide Field Camera 3 (WFC3) Early Release Science (ERS) programme. Our adaptive mesh refinement simulations include metal-dependent radiative cooling, star formation, kinetic outflows due to supernova explosions and feedback from supermassive black holes. Our model assumes that when gas accretes on to black holes, a fraction of the energy is used to form either thermal winds or subrelativistic momentum-imparting collimated jets, depending on the accretion rate. We find that the predicted rest-frame UVoptical colours of galaxies in the model that includes AGN feedback are in broad agreement with the observed colours of the WFC3 ERS sample at 1 ?z? 2. The predicted number of massive galaxies also matches well with observations in this redshift range. However, the massive galaxies are predicted to show higher levels of residual star formation activity than the observational estimates, suggesting the need for further suppression of star formation without significantly altering the stellar mass function. We discuss possible improvements, involving faster stellar assembly through enhanced star formation during galaxy mergers while star formation at the peak epoch is still modulated by the AGN feedback.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据