4.4 Article

Molecular characterization of Theileria equi in horses from the state of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

期刊

TICKS AND TICK-BORNE DISEASES
卷 9, 期 2, 页码 349-353

出版社

ELSEVIER GMBH, URBAN & FISCHER VERLAG
DOI: 10.1016/j.ttbdis.2017.11.011

关键词

Equine piroplasmosis; Theileriosis; Phylogeny; 18S rRNA gene; Genetic diversity

资金

  1. National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq) of Brazil
  2. 'Carlos Chagas Filho' Foundation for Research Support of the State of Rio de Janeiro (FAPERJ)
  3. Coordination of Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Theileria equi is one of the etiologic agents of the equine piroplasmosis. This infectious disease is transmitted by ticks and is a worldwide problem in the international horse movement. The 18S rRNA gene of T. equi is often used for genotyping and phylogenetic purpose. This study aimed to analyze the degree of the heterogeneity of the 18S rRNA gene of T. equi in horses from the state of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. The complete T. equi 18S rRNA sequences were obtained from twenty naturally infected horses. The PCR amplicons were cloned and sequenced. The phylogenetic analyses were performed using a set of T. equi 18S rRNA sequences and other related organisms available in ARB-Silva database. There were twelve distinct T. equi 18S rRNA gene sequences circulating in horses in the state of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Monophyletic clades with 2% evolutionary divergence between clades and high bootstrap value were the support to divide T. equi sequences in three distinct clades. The sequences from this study grouped into clades I (70%, n = 14/20) and II (30%, n= 6/20). All of the T. equi sequences grouped within a node other than the theileriids. This study reported a clear division of two distinct genotypes of T. equi 18S rRNA sequences in state of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, and it demonstrates that distinct isolates of T. equi can coexist in the same geographic region.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据