4.4 Article

The folA gene from the Rickettsia endosymbiont of Ixodes pacificus encodes a functional dihydrofolate reductase enzyme

期刊

TICKS AND TICK-BORNE DISEASES
卷 9, 期 3, 页码 443-449

出版社

ELSEVIER GMBH, URBAN & FISCHER VERLAG
DOI: 10.1016/j.ttbdis.2017.12.013

关键词

Rickettsia species phylotype G021; Ixodes pacificus; Dihydrofolate reductase; Recombinant protein; In vitro enzymatic assay

资金

  1. National Institute of Health [1 R15 AI099902-01]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Although nonpathogenic bacterial endosymbionts have been shown to contribute to their arthropod host's fitness by supplying them with essential vitamins and amino acids, little is known about the nutritional basis for the symbiotic relationship of endosymbionts in ticks. Our lab has previously reported that Rickettsia species phylotype G021 in Ixodes pacificus carries all five genes for de novo folate synthesis, and that these genes are monophyletic with homologs from other Rickettsia species. In this study, the rickettsial folate synthesis folA gene, coding for dihydrofolate reductase, was PCR amplified, cloned into an expression vector, and overexpressed in E. coli. Bioinformatic analysis identified that the FolA protein of phylotype G021 has the conserved DHFR domain, NADP binding sites, and substrate binding sites of bacterial dihydrofolate reductase. SDS-PAGE results showed that recombinant rickettsial FolA protein was overexpressed in BL21(DE3) E. coli in its soluble form. Affinity chromatography was used to purify the protein, and in vitro enzyme assays were performed to assess the biochemical activity of dihydrofolate reductase. The specific activity of recombinant FolA from phylotype G021 was determined to be 16.1 U/mg. This study has revealed that Rickettsia species phylotype G021 of I. pacificus is capable of producing a functional enzyme of the folate biosynthesis pathway, addressing the nutritional interactions behind the symbiosis between Rickettsia species phylotype G021 and its host.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据