4.6 Article

Anti-Inflammatory Effect of Baicalein on Polyinosinic-Polycytidylic Acid-Induced RAW 264.7 Mouse Macrophages

期刊

VIRUSES-BASEL
卷 10, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/v10050224

关键词

baicalein; dsRNA; inflammation; macrophages; nitric oxide; cytokine; calcium; STAT; CHOP

类别

资金

  1. Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea - Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning [2017R1A2B4004933]
  2. Gachon University research fund of 2017 [GCU-2017-0182]
  3. National Research Foundation of Korea [2017R1A2B4004933] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Baicalein (3,3,4,5,6-pentahydroxyflavone) is a well-known antioxidant found in many plants, such as in the roots of Scutellaria baicalensis. In this study, we evaluate the inhibitory effect of baicalein on the inflammatory cascade in RAW 264.7 mouse macrophages induced by viral-like material. Experimental assays used in this study included Griess reagent assay for nitric oxide (NO) production, Fluo-4 assay for intracellular calcium release, multiplex cytokine assay, and quantitative real time RT-PCR assay. To induce inflammation, RAW 264.7 cells were treated with polyinosinic-polycytidylic acid (poly I:C), a synthetic analog of double-stranded RNA (dsRNA). Baicalein at concentrations up to 100 M significantly inhibited the production of NO, IL-1, IL-6, G-CSF, GM-CSF, VEGF, MCP-1, IP-10, LIX, and RANTES as well as calcium release in RAW 264.7 cells induced by poly I:C (50 mu g/mL) (all p < 0.05). Baicalein at concentrations up to 50 M also significantly inhibited mRNA expression of STAT1, STAT3, CHOP, and Fas in poly I:C-induced RAW 264.7 cells (p < 0.05). In conclusion, baicalein has anti-inflammatory effect in double-stranded RNA (dsRNA)-induced macrophages by inhibiting NO, cytokines, chemokines, and growth factors via the endoplasmic reticulum stress-CHOP/STAT pathway.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据