4.8 Article

Plasma-Assisted Synthesis of High-Mobility Atomically Layered Violet Phosphorus

期刊

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
卷 7, 期 25, 页码 13723-13727

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.5b03803

关键词

plasma; violet phosphorus; mobility; selective reaction; two-dimensional materials

资金

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology [101-2112-M-007-015-MY3, 101-2218-E-007-009-MY3, 102-2633-M-007-002, 102-2221-E-007-097-MY2]
  2. National Tsing Hua University [102N2022E1, 102N2744E1]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Two-dimensional layered materials such as graphene, transition metal dichalcogenides, and black phosphorus have demonstrated outstanding properties due to electron confinement as the thickness is reduced to atomic scale. Among the phosphorus allotropes, black phosphorus, and violet phosphorus possess layer structure with the potential to be scaled down to atomically thin film. For the first time, the plasma-assisted synthesis of atomically layered violet phosphorus has been achieved. Material characterization supports the formation of violet phosphorus/InN over InP substrate where the layer structure of violet phosphorus is clearly observed. The identification of the crystal structure and lattice constant ratifies the formation of violet phosphorus indeed. The critical concept of this synthesis method is the selective reaction induced by different variations of Gibbs free energy (?G) of reactions. Besides, the Hall mobility of the violet phosphorus on the InP substrate greatly increases over the theoretical values of InP bulk material without much reduction in the carrier concentration, suggesting that the mobility enhancement results from the violet phosphorus layers. Furthermore, this study demonstrates a low-cost technique with high compatibility to synthesize the high-mobility atomically layered violet phosphorus and open the space for the study of the fundamental properties of this intriguing material as a new member of the fast growing family of 2D crystals.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据