4.2 Article

2H NMR Studies on the Dynamics of Pure and Mixed Hydrogen-Bonded Liquids in Confinement

出版社

WALTER DE GRUYTER GMBH
DOI: 10.1515/zpch-2017-1027

关键词

confinement; hydrogen-bonded liquids; NMR

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) [FOR 1583, Vo-905/8-1/2, Vo-905/10-1/2]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

H-2 NMR is used to ascertain dynamical behaviors of pure and mixed hydrogen-bonded liquids in bulk and in confinement. Detailed comparisons of previous and new results in broad dynamic and temperature ranges reveal that confinement effects differ for various liquids and confinements. For water, molecular reorientation strongly depends on the confinement size, with much slower and less fragile structural relaxation under more severe geometrical restriction. Moreover, a dynamical crossover occurs when a fraction of solid water forms so that the dynamics of the fraction of liquid water becomes even more restricted and, as a consequence, changes from bulk-like to interface-dominated. For glycerol, by contrast, confinement has weak effects on the reorientation dynamics. Mixed hydrogen-bonded liquids show even more complex dynamical behaviors. For aqueous solutions, the temperature dependence of the structural relaxation becomes discontinuous when the concentration changes due to a freezing of water fractions. This tendency for partial crystallization is enhanced rather than reduced by confinement, because different liquid-matrix interactions of the molecular species induce micro-phase segregation, which facilitates ice formation in water-rich regions. In addition, dynamical couplings at solvent-protein interfaces are discussed. It is shown that, on the one hand, solvent dynamics are substantially slowed down at protein surfaces and, on the other hand, protein dynamics significantly depend on the composition and, thus, the viscosity of the solvent. Furthermore, a protein dynamical transition occurs when the amplitude of water-coupled restricted backbone dynamics vanishes upon cooling.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据