4.2 Article

Extracellular Vesicles Derived from Hypoxic Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells Attenuate GSK3 beta Expression via miRNA-26a in an Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury Model

期刊

YONSEI MEDICAL JOURNAL
卷 59, 期 6, 页码 736-745

出版社

YONSEI UNIV COLL MEDICINE
DOI: 10.3349/ymj.2018.59.6.736

关键词

Extracellular vesicles; ischemia reperfusion; arrhythmia; GSK3 beta; miRNA-26a

资金

  1. Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea - Ministry of Education, Science and Technology [NRF-2017R1A2B3003303]
  2. Korean Healthcare Technology R&D project - Ministry of Health Welfare [HI16C0058]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: Bioactive molecules critical to intracellular signaling are contained in extracellular vesides (EVs) and have cardioprotective effects in ischemia/reperfusion (IR) injured hearts. This study investigated the mechanism of the cardioprotective effects of EVs derived from hypoxia-preconditioned human mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs). Materials and Methods: EV solutions (0.4 mu g/mu L) derived from normoxia-preconditioned MSCs (EVNM) and hypoxia-preconditioned MSCs (EVHM) were delivered in a rat IR injury model. Successful EV delivery was confirmed by the detection of PKH26 staining in hearts from EV-treated rats. Results: EVHM significantly reduced infarct size (24 +/- 2% vs. 8 +/- 1%, p<0.001), and diminished arrhythmias by recovering electrical conduction, I-Na current, and Cx43 expression. EVHM also reversed reductions in Wntl and beta-catenin levels and increases in GSK3 beta induced after IR injury. miRNA-26a was significantly increased in EVHM, compared with EVNM, in real-time PCR. Finally, in in vitro experiments, hypoxia-induced increases in GSK3 beta expression were significantly reduced by the overexpression of miRNA-26a. Conclusion: EVHM reduced IR injury by suppressing GSK3 beta expression via miRNA-26a and increased Cx43 expression. These findings suggest that the beneficial effect of EVHM related with Wnt signaling pathway.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据