4.7 Article

Effects of blade material characteristics on the high-speed rubbing behavior between Al-hBN abradable seal coatings and blades

期刊

WEAR
卷 410, 期 -, 页码 25-33

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.wear.2018.06.003

关键词

Aero engine; High-speed rubbing; Seal coating; Blade material; Thermal property

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [50675215]
  2. Tribology Science Fund of State Key Laboratory of Tribology [SKLTKF15B09]
  3. Innovation Foundation of China Aviation Industry Corp. [2010E41018]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Abradable seal coatings have been widely used in aero-engine to reduce gas path clearance. Research has been performed to evaluate the abradability of the seal coating. In addition, the high-speed rubbing test rig has been employed to simulate the interaction between the seal coating and blade. However, almost all previous studies tested blades made of one type of material. In real engines, the blade material for a seal coating is changeable. In this work, blades made of different titanium alloys were tested and rubbed against the same Al-hBN seal coating. Macro-morphology and micro-morphology observations with scanning electron microscopy (SEM) were employed to examine the wear behavior of the blade-coating couple. The results indicated that the Ti6Al4V blade exhibited the most severe coating adhesions and almost no blade wear; the Ti-8Al-1Mo-1V blade experienced less coating adhesions; and the Ti-5Al-2Sn-2Zr-4Cr-4Mo blade exhibited the least coating adhesions. The mechanical strengths at room and high temperatures and the rub performances during the single pendulum scratch test were checked to find the relationship between the mechanical properties and high-speed rub performances. Unfortunately, high mechanical strength did not appear to guarantee the absence of blade wear, and the thermal properties of the different materials blades were identified as the main reason for the different wear behaviors.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据