4.5 Article

Low-dissolved-oxygen nitrification in tropical sewage: an investigation on potential, performance and functional microbial community

期刊

WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
卷 77, 期 9, 页码 2274-2283

出版社

IWA PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.2166/wst.2018.143

关键词

activated sludge; ammonia-oxidising bacteria; biological nitrogen removal; nitrification; Nitrospira; tropical climate

资金

  1. Royal Society
  2. Academy of Sciences Malaysia
  3. Malaysian Industry-Government Group for High Technology (MIGHT)
  4. Indah Water Konsortium Sdn. Bhd

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Intensive aeration for nitrification is a major energy consumer in sewage treatment plants (STPs). Low-dissolved-oxygen (low-DO) nitrification has the potential to lower the aeration demand. However, the applicability of low-DO nitrification in the tropical climate is not well-understood. In this study, the potential of low-DO nitrification in tropical setting was first examined using batch kinetic experiments. Subsequently, the performance of low-DO nitrification was investigated in a laboratory-scale sequential batch reactor (SBR) for 42 days using real tropical sewage. The batch kinetic experiments showed that the seed sludge has a relatively high oxygen affinity. Thus, the rate of nitrification was not significantly reduced at low DO concentrations (0.5 mg/L). During the operation of the low-DO nitrification SBR, 90% of NH4-N was removed. The active low-DO nitrification was mainly attributed to the limited biodegradable organics in the sewage. Fluorescence in-situ hybridisation and 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing revealed the nitrifiers were related to Nitrospira genus and Nitrosomonadaceae family. Phylogenetic analysis suggests 47% of the operational taxonomic units in Nitrospira genus are closely related to a comammox bacteria. This study has demonstrated active low-DO nitrification in tropical setting, which is a more sustainable process that could significantly reduce the energy footprint of STPs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据