4.7 Article

An Iterative Local Updating Ensemble Smoother for Estimation and Uncertainty Assessment of Hydrologic Model Parameters With Multimodal Distributions

期刊

WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH
卷 54, 期 3, 页码 1716-1733

出版社

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1002/2017WR020906

关键词

ensemble smoother; inverse modeling; multimodal distribution

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41721001, 41771254]
  2. NSF [DMS-1555072]
  3. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Advanced Scientific Computing Research, Applied Mathematics program as part of the Multifaceted Mathematics for Complex Energy Systems (M2ACS) project
  4. Collaboratory on Mathematics for Mesoscopic Modeling of Materials project

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ensemble smoother (ES) has been widely used in inverse modeling of hydrologic systems. However, for problems where the distribution of model parameters is multimodal, using ES directly would be problematic. One popular solution is to use a clustering algorithm to identify each mode and update the clusters with ES separately. However, this strategy may not be very efficient when the dimension of parameter space is high or the number of modes is large. Alternatively, we propose in this paper a very simple and efficient algorithm, i.e., the iterative local updating ensemble smoother (ILUES), to explore multimodal distributions of model parameters in nonlinear hydrologic systems. The ILUES algorithm works by updating local ensembles of each sample with ES to explore possible multimodal distributions. To achieve satisfactory data matches in nonlinear problems, we adopt an iterative form of ES to assimilate the measurements multiple times. Numerical cases involving nonlinearity and multimodality are tested to illustrate the performance of the proposed method. It is shown that overall the ILUES algorithm can well quantify the parametric uncertainties of complex hydrologic models, no matter whether the multimodal distribution exists.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据