4.7 Article

Riverine Bathymetry Imaging With Indirect Observations

期刊

WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH
卷 54, 期 5, 页码 3704-3727

出版社

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2017WR021649

关键词

-

资金

  1. Army High Performance Computing Research Center (AHPCRC - U.S. Army Research Laboratory) at Stanford University [W911NF-07-2-0027]
  2. Hawai'i Experimental Program to Stimulate Competitive Research (EPSCoR) by the National Science Foundation Research Infrastructure Improvement (RII) Track1: 'Ike Wai: Securing Hawai'i's Water Future Award [OIA 1557349]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Bathymetry, i.e., depth, imaging in a river is of crucial importance for shipping operations and flood management. With advancements in sensor technology and plentiful computational resources, various types of indirect measurements can be used to estimate high-resolution river bed topography. In this work, we image river bed topography using depth-averaged quasi-steady velocity observations related to the topography through the 2-D shallow water equations. The principal component geostatistical approach (PCGA), a fast and scalable variational inverse modeling method powered by low-rank representation of covariance matrix structure, is presented and applied to two riverine bathymetry identification problems. To compare the efficiency and effectiveness of the proposed method, an ensemble-based approach is also applied to the test problems. It is demonstrated that PCGA is superior to the ensemble-based approach in terms of computational effort and accuracy because of the successive linearization of the forward model and the optimal low-rank representation of the prior covariance matrix. To investigate how different low-rank covariance matrix representation by the two approaches can affect the solution accuracy, we analyze the direct survey data of the river bottom topography in the test problem and show that PCGA utilizes more efficient and parsimonious choice of the solution basis than the ensemble-based approach. Geostatistical analysis performed on the direct survey data also confirms the validity of the chosen covariance model and its structural parameters.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据