4.8 Article

Nitrogen recovery from wastewater using gas-permeable membranes: Impact of inorganic carbon content and natural organic matter

期刊

WATER RESEARCH
卷 137, 期 -, 页码 201-210

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2018.03.013

关键词

Ammonia recovery; Ammonia capture; Gas-permeable membranes; Livestock wastewater; Ammonia emissions control

资金

  1. Ministry of Economy & Competitiveness of Spain
  2. European Regional Development Fund (ERDF, Una manera de hacer Europa) [AGL2013-41612-R]
  3. USDA-ARS [6082-13630-001-00D]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Gas-permeable membranes coupled with low-rate aeration is useful to recover ammonia (NH4+) from livestock effluents. In this study, the role of inorganic carbon (bicarbonate, HCO3-) to enhance the N recovery process was evaluated using synthetic effluents with various NH4+ to HCO3- molar ratios of 0.5, 1.0,1.5 and 2.0. The study also evaluated the effect of increased organic matter on the NH4+ recovery using humic acids (3000-6000 mg L-1), and the N recovery from high-strength swine manure. The release of hydroxide from the HCO3- with aeration increased the wastewater pH and promoted gaseous ammonia formation and membrane uptake. At the same time, the recovery of gaseous ammonia (NH3) through the membrane acidified the wastewater. Therefore, an abundant inorganic carbon supply in balance with the NH4+ is needed for a successful operation of the technology. NH4+ removal efficiencies >96% were obtained with NH4+ to HCO3- ratios <= 1. However, higher molar ratios inhibited the N recovery process resulting in lower efficiencies (<65%). Fortunately, most swine manures contain ample supply of endogenous inorganic carbon and the process can be used to more economically recover the ammonia using the natural inorganic carbon instead of expensive alkali chemicals. In 4 days, the recovered NH4+ from swine manure contained 48,000 mg L-1. Finally, it was found the process was not inhibited by the increasing levels of organic matter in the wastewater evaluated. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据