4.2 Article

Characterization of efficacy and safety of pathogen inactivated and quarantine plasma in routine use for treatment of acquired immune thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura

期刊

VOX SANGUINIS
卷 113, 期 5, 页码 459-467

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/vox.12663

关键词

cardiac diseases; infection; plasmapheresis; thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura; transfusion medicine; transfusion reaction

资金

  1. Cerus Corporation
  2. Association ARMESA

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BackgroundAuto-immune thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) is a morbid multi-organ disorder. Cardiac involvement not recognized in initial disease descriptions is a major cause of morbidity. Therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) requires exposure to multiple plasma donors with risk of transfusion-transmitted infection (TTI). Pathogen inactivation (PI) with amotosalen-UVA, the INTERCEPT Blood System for Plasma (IBSP) is licensed to reduce TTI risk. MethodsAn open-label, retrospective study evaluated the efficacy of quarantine plasma (QP) and IBSP in TTP and defined treatment emergent cardiac abnormalities. Medical record review of sequential patient cohorts treated with QP and IBSP characterized efficacy by remission at 30 and 60 days (d) of treatment, time to remission, and volume (L/kg) of plasma required. Safety outcomes focused on cardiac adverse events (AE), relapse rates, and mortality. ResultsThirty-one patients (18 IBSP and 13 QP) met study criteria for auto-immune TTP. The proportions (%) of patients in remission at 30 d (IBSP = 611, QP = 462, P = 0570) and 60 d (IBSP = 778, QP = 769, P = 100) were not different. Median days to remission were less for IBSP (150 vs. 240, P = 0003). Relapse rates (%) 60 d after remission were not different between cohorts (IBSP = 71, QP = 400, P = 0150). ECG abnormalities before and during TPE were frequent; however, cardiac AE and mortality were not different between treatment cohorts. ConclusionsCardiac and a spectrum of ECG findings are common in TTP. In this study, IBSP and QP had similar therapeutic profiles for TPE.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据