4.5 Article

In vitro assessment of the acaricidal activity of carvacrol, thymol, eugenol and their acetylated derivatives on Rhipicephalus microplus (Acari: Ixodidae)

期刊

VETERINARY PARASITOLOGY
卷 260, 期 -, 页码 1-4

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2018.07.009

关键词

Cattle tick; Carvacrol acetate; Thymol acetate; Eugenol acetate

资金

  1. Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior (CAPES)
  2. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico (CNPq)
  3. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (FAPERJ)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study reports the comparative evaluation of the activity of carvacrol, thymol, eugenol and their respective acetylated derivatives (carvacrol acetate, thymol acetate and eugenol acetate) on Rhipicephalus microplus, to verify the possible influence of the acetate group. The acetylated derivatives were prepared from reactions of the phenolic compounds with acetic anhydride/pyridine. The formation of the products was confirmed by analysis of hydrogen and carbon-13 nuclear magnetic resonance (H-1 and C-13 NMR) spectra. The larval packet test was used to evaluate the acaricidal activity, with concentrations of 0.312, 0.625, 1.25, 2.5, 5.0, 7.5, 10.0 and 15.0 mg/mL. Thymol and carvacrol resulted in 100% mortality starting at the concentration of 2.5 mg/mL, while the same was observed for carvacrol acetate starting at the concentration of 5.0 mg/mL. For the other treatments, 100% mortality was only achieved in the groups treated with the highest concentration (15.0 mg/mL). The LC50 and LC90 values (mg/mL) of carvacrol acetate (2.49, 4.21), thymol acetate (2.97, 8.52) and eugenol acetate (4.25, 13.10) were higher than those for the corresponding precursor molecules carvacrol (0.83, 2.02), thymol (1.26, 2.21) and eugenol (2.77, 5.35). The acetylation process did not enhance the activity of these substances on unengorged larvae of R. microplus, since the precursor substances (carvacrol, thymol and eugenol) had greater efficacy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据