4.5 Article

Probabilistic assessment of railway vehicle-curved track systems considering track random irregularities

期刊

VEHICLE SYSTEM DYNAMICS
卷 56, 期 10, 页码 1552-1576

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/00423114.2018.1424916

关键词

Vehicle-track interactions; curved track; track irregularity probabilistic model; probability density evolution method; reliability analysis

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51735012, 51478482, 51678507, 11790283]
  2. Program of Introducing Talents of Discipline to Universities (111 Project) [B16041]
  3. China Scholarship Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The randomness of track irregularities directly leads to the random vibration of the vehicle-track systems. To assess the dynamic performance of a railway system in more comprehensive and practical ways, a framework for probabilistic assessment of vehicle-curved track systems is developed by effectively integrating a vehicle-track coupled model (VTCM), a track irregularity probabilistic model (TIPM) with a probability density evolution method (PDEM). In VTCM, the railway vehicle and the curved track are coupled by the nonlinear wheel-rail interaction forces, and through TIPM, the ergodic properties of random track irregularities on amplitudes, wavelengths and probabilities can be properly considered in the dynamic calculations. Lastly, PDEM, a newly developed method for solving probabilistic transmissions between stochastic excitations and deterministic dynamic responses, is introduced to this probabilistic assessment model. Numerical examples validate the correctness and practicability of the proposed models. In this paper, the results of probabilistic assessment are presented to illustrate the dynamic behaviours of a high-speed railway vehicle subject to curved tracks with various radii, and to demonstrate the importance of considering the actual status of wheel-rail contacts and curve negotiation effects in vehicle-curved track interactions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据