4.5 Article

Field and Laboratory Evaluation of the CS655 Soil Water Content Sensor

期刊

VADOSE ZONE JOURNAL
卷 17, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.2136/vzj2017.12.0214

关键词

-

资金

  1. Jackson School of Geosciences Foundation
  2. G. Rollie White Foundation
  3. NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Soil moisture sensors infer volumetric soil water content (SWC) from other properties of the bulk porous media. The CS655 water content reflectometer is a relatively new, low-frequency electromagnetic sensor that determines relative permittivity (K-a) using the two-way travel period and voltage attenuation of the applied signal along two 12-cm rods. This measured attenuation is quadratically related to bulk electrical conductivity (EC). Along with an onboard thermistor, the CS655 allows a more robust correction of propagation time and K-a, which its predecessors, the CS615 and CS616, lacked. However, with new sensors it is necessary to quantify their practical accuracy in the field. Here, we present an overview of the CS655 sensor and an evaluation under both laboratory and field conditions, using five surface soils (0-10-cm depth) in the laboratory and gravimetric samples collected in the field. Overall, a site-specific calibration using a two-term linearization of the SWC-K-a function reduced the root mean square error (RMSE) of the factory-derived SWC of 0.073 and 0.043 m(3) m(-3) during batch and infiltration experiments, respectively, to 0.025 and 0.028 m(3) m(-3). Results further indicate that a soil-specific calibration additionally reduced the RMSE to <0.02 m(3) m(-3). Field evaluation across the Texas Soil Observation Network found that calibration reduced the variance across the network but did not affect the arithmetic mean or the RMSE against gravimetric sampling, which remained similar to 0.05 m(3) m(-3) regardless of the SWC-K-a-EC function applied. At the regional scale, a global calibration is sufficient.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据