4.5 Article

Strength and Permeability of Cultivated Histosols Characterized by Differing Degrees of Decomposition

期刊

VADOSE ZONE JOURNAL
卷 17, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.2136/vzj2017.08.0156

关键词

-

资金

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) through a Collaborative Research and Development Grant
  2. Productions Horticoles Van Winden
  3. Les Fermes Hotte et Van Winden
  4. Delfland
  5. Vert Nature

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cultivated organic soils (Histosols) are an important part of the agricultural economy in Canada. However, problems of degradation and compaction affect this particular type of soil. The objective of this study was to characterize the soil penetration resistance and the saturated hydraulic conductivity (k(sat)) in cultivated organic soils that differed in their degree of decomposition. Three fields in the plain of Montreal, in southwestern Quebec, were selected to provide a gradient of degrees of decomposition. Site 1 was classified as a Limnic Fibrisol, Site 2 was classified as a Terric Mesic Humisol, and Site 3 was classified as a Terric Humisol. At each site, penetration resistance and k(sat) were measured directly in the field. Penetration resistance, particularly at the 25-cm depth and deeper, was found to increase with increasing soil degradation. An inverse relationship was observed for k(sat) in the compact layer. The results presented in this study indicate that penetration resistance and k(sat) are both linked to the degree of soil decomposition. However, the relationship between both parameters is complex, and both parameters are to be measured to achieve a more accurate characterization of organic soils. Further work could assess the depth of the compact layer, as well as the degree of decomposition of organic soils at different spatial scales using penetration resistance. In Histosols, accurately mapping k(sat) would help in designing field drainage system, as this soil property is difficult to predict from other parameters.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据