4.5 Article

Self-assembling protein nanoparticles with built-in flagellin domains increases protective efficacy of a Plasmodium falciparum based vaccine

期刊

VACCINE
卷 36, 期 6, 页码 906-914

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2017.12.001

关键词

Plasmodium falciparum; Malaria; Vaccine; Nanoparticle; Self-assembling protein nanoparticle; Flagellin; Immune-profiling; Protection

资金

  1. NIH [1R01AI068761-01A2]
  2. CDMRP Joint Warfighter Program [JW140111]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To eliminate the problems associated with the use of extraneous adjuvants we have designed a Self Assembling Protein Nanoparticle (SAPN) containing epitopes from the Plasmodium falciparum circumsporozoite protein (PfCSP) (designated FMP014) and portions of the TLR5 agonist flagellin (designated FMP014(D0D1)) as an intrinsic adjuvant. By combining different molar ratios of FMP014 to FMP014(D0D1) monomers before self-assembly, we generated multiple nanoparticles and investigated their biophysical characteristics, immunogenicity and protective efficacy. Immunization with the construct formulated with the ratio 58:2 of FMP014 to FMP014(D0D1) had the highest protective efficacy against a challenge with a transgenic P. berghei sporozoite expressing PfCSP. Increasing the proportion of flagellin per particle resulted in an inverse relationship with levels of both antibody titers and protection. The cytokine profiles of the various immunization groups were evaluated and quantitative amounts of the cytokines IL-2, IFN-gamma, IL -12/p70 (Th1); IL4, IL5 (Th2); TNF-alpha, IL1 beta, IL-6, KC/GRO (pro-inflammatory), and IL-10 (immunomodulatory) were measured. The relationship of the cytokines to each other revealed a strong immunomodulatory effect depending on the proportion of flagellin in the construct. Our results demonstrate that SAPNs with flagellin may be a promising strategy for the development and delivery of a safe vaccine for infectious diseases. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据