4.5 Review

The use of eHealth with immunizations: An overview of systematic reviews

期刊

VACCINE
卷 36, 期 52, 页码 7923-7928

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2018.06.076

关键词

eHealth; Digital health; Vaccination(s); Immunisation(s); Immunisation information system(s); Electronic immunisation registry/ies

资金

  1. World Health Organization [001] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: eHealth interventions may help increase vaccination uptake and health literacy related to immunization and improve immunization program efficiency. Objectives: To see where and how eHealth technologies have had a positive impact on immunization practices using eHealth strategies to increase vaccination uptake, improve immunization program efficiency and advance heath literacy related to immunizations. Methods: An overview of systematic reviews was conducted, searching PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Web of Science for systematic reviews published through August 2017 for eHealth and immunizations (using pre-determined concepts for each). Two independent reviewers selected studies based on a priori criteria; disagreement was resolved by consensus. The quality of the included studies was evaluated using the Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR). Results: The primary search identified 198 results. After eliminating duplicates 158 remained. Upon applying the a priori set criteria to these, six articles were left to analyze. Four articles showed a positive relationship (a demonstrated benefit, improvement, increase in vaccination uptake, etc. when using eHealth technologies for immunization), one showed a promising relation / with potential, and one showed unknown effects as it focused on the difficulty of analyzing cost-benefits of immunization information systems (IIS). Conclusion: The review leads to a recommendation of using eHealth technologies to encourage immunizations and increase vaccination adherence and uptake and to continue assessing and documenting the use of eHealth for immunization. (C) 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据