4.5 Article

Lipopolysaccharide-specific memory B cell responses to an attenuated live cholera vaccine are associated with protection against Vibrio cholerae infection

期刊

VACCINE
卷 36, 期 20, 页码 2768-2773

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2018.04.011

关键词

Memory B cells; Cholera; Live vaccine; Duration of protection; Cholera-naive; CVD 103-HgR

资金

  1. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health [U19 AI-082655, AI103055]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: The single-dose live attenuated vaccine CVD 103-HgR protects against experimental Vibrio cholerae infection in cholera-naive adults for at least 6 months after vaccination. While vaccineinduced vibriocidal seroconversion is associated with protection, vibriocidal titers decline rapidly from their peak 1-2 weeks after vaccination. Although vaccine-induced memory B cells (MBCs) might mediate sustained protection in individuals without detectable circulating antibodies, it is unknown whether oral cholera vaccination induces a MBC response. Methods: In a study that enrolled North American adults, we measured lipopolysaccharide (LPS)- and cholera toxin (CtxB)-specific MBC responses to PXVX0200 (derived from the CVD 103-HgR strain) and assessed stool volumes following experimental Vibrio cholerae infection. We then evaluated the association between vaccine-induced MBC responses and protection against cholera. Results: There was a significant increase in % Cr-specific IgG, % LPS-specific IgG, and % LPS-specific IgA MBCs which persisted 180 days after vaccination as well as a significant association between vaccine-induced increase in % LPS-specific IgA MBCs and lower post-challenge stool volume (r = -0.56, p < 0.001). Discussion: Oral cholera vaccination induces antigen-specific MBC responses, and the anamnestic LPS specific responses may contribute to long-term protection and provide correlates of the duration of vaccine-induced protection. (C) 2018 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据