4.2 Article

Biophysical and immunological characterization of the ESX-4 system ESAT-6 family proteins Rv3444c and Rv3445c from Mycobacterium tuberculosis H37Rv

期刊

TUBERCULOSIS
卷 109, 期 -, 页码 85-96

出版社

CHURCHILL LIVINGSTONE
DOI: 10.1016/j.tube.2018.02.002

关键词

-

资金

  1. CSIR Network Projects [BSC0120]
  2. University Grants Commission (UGC) New Delhi, India
  3. Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR) New Delhi, India

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The ESAT-6 family proteins of Mycobacterium tuberculosis are regarded as the key mediators in mycobacterial virulence and are largely considered as antigens that can improve TB vaccines and diagnostics. We have characterized Rv3444c and Rv3445c proteins of the ESX-4 system of ESAT-6 family of M. tuberculosis H37Rv, and have experimentally established that these two proteins interact to form a heterodimeric complex. Complex formation resulted in induction of a-helical conformation and stability against chemical denaturation. To evaluate the immunogenic potential, we have immunized mice with Rv3444c or Rv3445c along with Freund's incomplete adjuvant (FIA). Immunization with Rv3444c-FIA or Rv3445c-FIA resulted in long term humoral responses. Re-stimulation of splenocytes from immunized mice resulted in significant lymphocyte proliferation with induction of TNF-alpha and IL-6. Further, the humoral responses to Rv3444c and Rv3445c antigens in Indian patients with active pulmonary TB (n = 44), and healthy individuals (n = 20), were investigated. Compared to healthy individuals, high levels of IgG against Rv3444c and Rv3445c were observed in TB patient's sera, indicating that these proteins are actively produced during the active phase of TB. Cellular immune responses to these proteins in active pulmonary TB patients (n = 5) were also investigated using peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs). Both the proteins induce significant lymphocyte proliferation and up-regulate the induction of TNF-alpha and IL-6 in TB patients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据