4.5 Article Proceedings Paper

The Value of Flexibility in Robust Location-Transportation Problems

期刊

TRANSPORTATION SCIENCE
卷 52, 期 1, 页码 189-209

出版社

INFORMS
DOI: 10.1287/trsc.2016.0728

关键词

transportation; facility location; robust optimization; flexibility; conservative approximation; demand uncertainty

资金

  1. Canadian Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council [386416-2010]
  2. Canada Research Chair program

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article studies a capacitated fixed-charge multiperiod location-transportation problem in which, while the location and capacity of each facility must be determined immediately, the determination of the final production and distribution of products can be delayed until actual orders are received in each period. In contexts where little is known about future demand, robust optimization, namely using a budgeted uncertainty set, becomes a natural method for identifying meaningful decisions. Unfortunately, it is well known that these types of multiperiod robust decision problems are computationally intractable. To overcome this difficulty, we propose a set of tractable conservative approximations for the problem that each exploit to a different extent the idea of reducing the flexibility of the delayed decisions. While all of these approximation models outperform previous approximation models that have been proposed for this problem, each also has the potential to reach a different level of compromise between efficiency of resolution and quality of the solution. A row generation algorithm is also presented to address problem instances of realistic size. We also demonstrate that full flexibility is often unnecessary to reach nearly, or even exact, optimal robust locations and capacities for the facilities. Finally, we illustrate our findings with an extensive numerical study wherewe evaluate the effect of the amount of uncertainty on the performance and structure of each approximate solution that can be obtained.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据