4.2 Article

Role for primary immunosuppression with everolimus after pulmonary transplantation

期刊

TRANSPLANT IMMUNOLOGY
卷 49, 期 -, 页码 12-19

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.trim.2018.03.005

关键词

Lung transplantation; Everolimus; Cyclosporine A; Primary immunosuppression

资金

  1. Hannover Medical School [79490008]
  2. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Co., Basel, Switzerland [19490088]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: Everolimus is a proliferation signal inhibitor used for triple immunosuppressive therapy following solid organ transplantation. Its positive benefits, such as reduction of acute rejection episodes and reduced nephrotoxicity have been shown in kidney-as well as heart transplantation. However the role of everolimus is less well defined in lung transplantation. We thus wished to study the effect of primary immunosuppression with everolimus in a preclinical large animal lung transplantation model. Methods: Left-sided single lung transplantation from MHC-mismatched donors was performed in 11 adult minipigs. Intravenous pharmacologic immunosuppression was maintained for 28 days with 1.5 mg/kg/d methylprednisolone, 1.0 mg/kg/d azathioprine and cyclosporine A (blood levels 300-500 ng/ml; CsA group; n = 5). A further group (CsA + Ev; n = 6) received methylprednisolone, CsA (200-300 ng/ml) and Everolimus (5-10 ng/ml). Immunosuppression was discontinued on postoperative day (POD) 28. Graft survival was monitored by sequential chest X-rays, bronchoscopies and transbronchial biopsy histology. Results: All animals survived the 28 day course of immunosuppressive therapy and showed healthy grafts on POD 28. Median allograft survival in the CsA group was 55 +/- 15 days. CsA + Ev grafts showed median survival of 49 +/- 86 days (p = 0.37). Conclusion: Whereas everolimus might be advantageous as maintenance immunosuppressive agent, this data does not support an important role for everolimus in the immunosuppressive induction phase following lung transplantation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据