4.5 Article

The Chemokine Receptor CXCR4 and c-MET Cooperatively Promote Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition in Gastric Cancer Cells

期刊

TRANSLATIONAL ONCOLOGY
卷 11, 期 2, 页码 487-497

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.tranon.2018.02.002

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. National Science and Technology Major Project of the Ministry of Science and Technology of China [2017ZX09304025]
  2. Science and Technology Plan Project of Liaoning Province [2015020457]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81572374, 81372547, 81201615]
  4. Liaoning Province Department of Education [LZ2015073]
  5. Foundation for Selected Overseas Chinese Scholar
  6. Key Research and Development Program of Shenyang [17-230-9-01]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The C-X-C motif chemokine receptor 4 (CXCR4) pathway can promote tumor metastasis but is dependent on cross talk with other signaling pathways. The MET proto-oncogene (c-MET) participates in metastasis and is highly expressed in gastric cancer. However, the relationship between CXCR4 and c-MET signaling and their mechanisms of action in gastric cancer metastasis remain unclear. In this study, in vitro experiments demonstrated that C-X-C motif chemokine ligand 12 (CXCL12)/CXCR4 induces epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) and promotes migration in gastric cancer cells, which is accompanied by c-MET activation. These phenomena were reversed by c-MET inhibition. Further investigation revealed that c-MET activation correlated with its interaction with caveolin 1 in lipid rafts, induced by CXCL12. In clinical samples, we observed a significant positive association between CXCR4 expression and c-MET phosphorylation (r = 0.259, P =.005). Moreover, samples expressing both receptors were found to indicate significantly poorer patient prognosis (P < .001). These results suggest that CXCL12 induces EMT at least partially through cross talk between CXCR4 and c-MET signaling. In addition, changes in these pathways could have clinical importance for the treatment of gastric cancer.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据