4.5 Article

Protective effects of dioscin against fructose-induced renal damage via adjusting Sirt3-mediated oxidative stress, fibrosis, lipid metabolism and inflammation

期刊

TOXICOLOGY LETTERS
卷 284, 期 -, 页码 37-45

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2017.11.031

关键词

Dioscin; Fructose-induced renal injury; Sirt3 signal; Oxidative stress; Inflammation; Lipid metabolism

资金

  1. Project of Liaoning BaiQianWan Talents Program [2015-65]
  2. Special Grant for Translational Medicine, Dalian Medical University [2015004]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In the present work, the effects and possible mechanisms of dioscin, one natural product from the famous vegetable Dioscoreae rhizoma (Shanyao in Chinese), against high fructose-induced renal injury in rats were tested. The results showed that dioscin significantly restored fructose-induced renal injury by decreasing the levels of Cr, BUN, and rehabilitating histopathological changes. In addition, dioscin markedly adjusted the levels of MDA, SOD and GSH-Px, reduced ROS level in renal tissue, and decreased the levels of TG, FFA, alpha-SMA and COL1A. Mechanistic study showed that dioscin significantly up-regulated the expression levels of Sirt3, SOD2, and then suppressed inflammation by decreasing the expression levels of NF-kB, HMGB1, c-Jun, c-Fos, COX2, TNF-alpha, IL-1 beta and IL-6. Furthermore, dioscin-caused high levels of Sirt3 and SOD2 attenuated oxidative stress by regulating the expression levels of Nrf2, GST, Keap1, regulated lipid metabolism by controlling the expression levels of SREBP-1 c, SCD-1, FASn, ACC, CPT1, and adjusted TGF-beta 1/Smad signal to inhibit renal fibrosis. In summary, dioscin showed protective effects against fructose-induced renal damage via adjusting Sirt3-mediated oxidative stress, renal fibrosis, lipid metabolism and inflammation, which should be considered as one candidate to treat renal injury in the future. We also suggest that the patients with renal injury can take more Shanyao for the therapy and treatment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据