4.3 Article

Day Length and Weather Effects on Children's Physical Activity and Participation in Play, Sports, and Active Travel

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL ACTIVITY & HEALTH
卷 9, 期 8, 页码 1105-1116

出版社

HUMAN KINETICS PUBL INC
DOI: 10.1123/jpah.9.8.1105

关键词

youth; seasonal variation; public health; daylight

资金

  1. National Institute for Health Research [PDF-2010-03-15] Funding Source: researchfish
  2. National Institutes of Health Research (NIHR) [PDF-2010-03-15] Funding Source: National Institutes of Health Research (NIHR)
  3. Department of Health [PDF-2010-03-15] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Children in primary school are more physically active in the spring/summer. Little is known about the relative contributions of day length and weather, however, or about the underlying behavioral mediators. Methods: 325 British children aged 8 to 11 wore accelerometers as an objective measure of physical activity, measured in terms of mean activity counts. Children simultaneously completed diaries in which we identified episodes of out-of-home play, structured sports, and active travel. Our main exposure measures were day length, temperature, rainfall, cloud cover, and wind speed. Results: Overall physical activity was higher on long days (>= 14 hours daylight), but there was no difference between short (< 9.5 hours) and medium days (10.2-12.6 hours). The effect of long clay length was largest between 5 PM and 8 PM, and persisted after adjusting for rainfall, cloud cover, and wind. Up to half this effect was explained by a greater duration and intensity of out-of-home play on long days; structured sports and active travel were less affected by day length. Conclusions: At least above a certain threshold, longer afternoon/evening daylight may have a causal role in increasing child physical activity. This strengthens the public health arguments for daylight saving measures such as those recently under consideration in Britain.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据