3.8 Article

Induction of Apoptosis of Bladder Cancer Cells by Zinc-Citrate Compound

期刊

KOREAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY
卷 53, 期 11, 页码 800-806

出版社

KOREAN UROLOGICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.4111/kju.2012.53.11.800

关键词

Apoptosis; Urinary bladder neoplasms

资金

  1. National R&D Program for Cancer Control, Ministry for Health and Welfare, Republic of Korea [1020080]
  2. Korea Health Promotion Institute [1020080] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: Zinc is one of the trace minerals in the body and is known to have an anticancer effect by inducing apoptosis in prostate cancer. We aimed to investigate the anti-proliferative effects of a zinc-citrate compound in bladder cancer. Materials and Methods: A bladder cancer cell line (MBT-2) was treated with a zinc-citrate compound at different time intervals and concentrations. Mitochondrial (m)-aconitase activity was determined by use of the aconitase assay. DNA laddering analysis was performed to investigate apoptosis of MBT-2 cells. The molecular mechanism of apoptosis was investigated by Western blot analysis of p53, p21(waf1), Bcl-2, Bcl-xL, and Bax and also by caspase-3 activity analysis. Results: Treatment with the zinc-citrate compound resulted in a time-and dose-dependent decrease in cell number of MBT-2 cells. M-aconitase activity was significantly decreased. DNA laddering analysis indicated apoptosis of MBT-2 cells. The zinc-citrate compound increased the expression of p21waf1 and p53 and reduced the expression of Bcl-2 and Bcl-xL proteins but induced expression of Bax protein. The zinc-citrate compound induced apoptosis of MBT-2 cells by activation of the caspase-3 pathway. Conclusions: We have shown that a zinc-citrate compound induces apoptotic cell death in a bladder cancer cell line, MBT-2, by caspase-3 activation through up-regulation of apoptotic proteins and down-regulation of antiapoptotic proteins.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据