4.6 Article

Spatial and temporal recruitment of the neurovascular unit during development of the mouse blood-retinal barrier

期刊

TISSUE & CELL
卷 52, 期 -, 页码 42-50

出版社

CHURCHILL LIVINGSTONE
DOI: 10.1016/j.tice.2018.03.010

关键词

Endothelial cells; Astrocytes; Pericytes; Retinal development

资金

  1. Diabetes Fonds (Dutch Diabetes Fund) [2014.00.1784]
  2. Landelijke Stichting voor Blinden en Slechtzienden
  3. Novartis Fonds
  4. MaculaFonds
  5. MaculaFonds through UitZicht [UitZicht 2014-33]
  6. Nederlandse Vereniging ter Verbetering van het Lot der Blinden, Rotterdamse Stichting Blindenbelangen [B20140050]
  7. Stichting Blindenhulp
  8. Edmond en Marianne Blaauw Fonds voor Oogheelkunde

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The inner blood-retinal barrier (BRB) is made up by the neurovascular unit, consisting of endothelial cells, pericytes and glial cells. The BRB maintains homeostasis of the neural retina, but in pathological eye conditions the neurovascular unit is often disrupted, causing BRB loss. Here, we investigated in detail temporal and spatial recruitment of the neurovascular unit in the neonatal mouse retina from postnatal day (P)3 to P25 employing immunohistochemical staining of vascular endothelium (isolectin B4), pericytes (a SMA and NG2) and astrocytes (GFAP). In addition, we investigated gene expression of polarized astrocytic end-feet markers aquaporin-4 and laminin a2 chain with qPCR. We observed GFAP-positive cells migrating ahead of the retinal vasculature during the first postnatal week, suggesting that the retinal vasculature follows an astrocytic meshwork. From P9 onwards, astrocytes acquired a mature phenotype, with a more stellate shape and increased expression of aquaporin-4. NG2-positive cells and tip cells co-localized at P5 and invaded the retina together as a vascular sprouting front. In summary, these data suggest that recruitment of the cell types of the neurovascular unit is a prerequisite for proper retinal vascularization and BRB formation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据