4.6 Article

Linking Paleogene Rifting and Inversion in the Northern Song Hong and Beibuwan Basins, Vietnam, With Left-Lateral Motion on the Ailao Shan-Red River Shear Zone

期刊

TECTONICS
卷 37, 期 8, 页码 2559-2585

出版社

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2018TC005090

关键词

Song Hong; Yinggehai Basin; Beibuwan Basin; Ailao Shan-Red River Shear Zone; escape tectonism; transtensional basin; structural inversion

资金

  1. PetroVietnam
  2. Vietnam Petroleum Institute (VPI)
  3. Geological Survey of Denmark and Greenland (GEUS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Extrusion tectonics forced by plate collisions shape continents not only through lateral terrain displacement and mountain building but also through massive rifting and basin development. The rift system underneath the Gulf of Tonkin, Vietnam, constitutes a world-class example of how extrusion tectonics drives continental rifting and transtensional basin development. Rifting and the Song Hong and Beibuwan Basin evolution are compared with the development of the Ailao Shan-Red River Shear Zone (ASRRSZ) that accommodated the extrusion of Indochina forced by the Indian-Eurasia collision. Rifting occurred during later Eocene-Late Oligocene time forced by ASRRSZ left-lateral shearing. Latest Oligocene-earliest Miocene transpression and inversion brought rifting to a halt, after which left-lateral shearing decreased. Paleogene rift systems extended along the trail of the ASRRSZ now outlined by lower to midcrustal metamorphic core complexes. Most of these rift systems were probably inverted and removed during the latest Oligocene-earliest Miocene, however. The metamorphic core complexes are suggested to represent the lower to midcrustal roots of these transtensional rift basins exhumed by inversion. Rift termination in the northern Gulf of Tonkin and exhumation of the metamorphic core complexes coincided with cessation of Paleogene rifting along the western South China Sea, and a common causal mechanism is speculated. Key Points

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据