4.7 Article

Branched polyethyleneimine-assisted boronic acid-functionalized silica nanoparticles for the selective enrichment of trace glycoproteins

期刊

TALANTA
卷 184, 期 -, 页码 235-243

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.talanta.2018.02.021

关键词

Glycoproteins; Boronic acid; Dissociation constants; Silica nanoparticles; Branched polyethyleneimine

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Boronate affinity materials have attracted more and more attention in extraction, separation and enrichment of glycoproteins due to the important roles that glycoproteins take on in recent years. However, conventional boronate affinity materials suffer from low binding affinity mainly because of the use of single boronic acids. This makes the extraction of glycoproteins of trace concentration become rather difficult or impossible. Here we present a novel boronate avidity material, polyethyleneimine (PEI)-assisted boronic acid-functionalized silica nanoparticles (SNPs). Branched PEI was applied as a scaffold to amplify the number of boronic acid moieties. While 3-carboxybenzoboroxole, exhibiting high affinity and excellent water solubility toward glycoproteins, was used as an affinity ligand. Due to the PEI-assisted synergistic multivalent binding, the boronate avidity SNPs exhibited strong binding strength toward glycoproteins with dissociation constants of 10(-7) M, which was the highest among reported boronic acid-functionalized materials that can be applied for glycoproteomic analysis. Such a high avidity enabled the selective extraction of trace glycoproteins as low as 0.4 pg/mL. This feature greatly favored the selective enrichment of trace glycoproteins from real samples. Meanwhile, the boronate avidity SNPs was tolerant of the interference of abundant sugars. In addition, the PEI-assisted boronate avidity SNPs exhibited high binding capacity and low binding pH. The feasibility for practical applications was demonstrated with the selective enrichment of trace glycoproteins in human saliva.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据