4.7 Article

A genome-inspired, reverse selection approach to aptamer discovery

期刊

TALANTA
卷 177, 期 -, 页码 150-156

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.talanta.2017.08.093

关键词

Aptamer; Genomic DNA; G-quadruplex; Cancer; Oncogene promoter

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [1R01GM112850]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Limitations of Systematic Evolution of Ligands by Exponential Enrichment (SELEX) and related methods that depend upon combinatorial oligonucleotide libraries have hindered progress in this area. Our laboratory has introduced a new approach to aptamer discovery that uses oligonucleotides with sequences drawn from the human genome to capture proteins from biological samples. Specifically, we have focused on capture of proteins in nuclear extracts from human cell lines using G-quadruplex (G4) forming genomic sequences. Previous studies identified capture of several proteins both in vitro and in live cells by the Pu28-mer sequence from the ERBB2 promoter region. Here we provide a more comprehensive study of protein capture from BT474 and MCF7 human breast cancer cells using G4-forming sequences from the CMYC, RB, VEGF and ERBB2 human oncogene promoter regions. Mass spectrometric analysis and Western blot analysis of protein capture at oligonucleotide-modified surfaces revealed capture of nucleolin by all three of the oligonucleotides in BT474 and MCF7 cells, and also of ribosomal protein L19 (RPL19) in BT474 cells. Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) analysis confirmed the interaction of nucleolin with all three promoter sequences in MCF7 cells and with RB in BT474 cells. ChIP also revealed interactions of RPL19 with CMYC in BT474 cells and of both RPL19 and ribosomal protein L14 (RPL14) with ERBB2 in BT474 cells. These results offer the basis for development of new aptamers based on the G4 sequences from the CMYC, RB, VEGF, and ERBB2 promoters toward proteins including nucleolin, RPL19 and RPL14. These interactions also may have biological and therapeutic significance.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据