4.7 Article

Nuclear forensics investigation of morphological signatures in the thermal decomposition of uranyl peroxide

期刊

TALANTA
卷 176, 期 -, 页码 284-292

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.talanta.2017.08.020

关键词

Nuclear forensics; Quantitative morphology; Uranyl peroxide; Uranium trioxide; Microstructural fingerprint; Image Analysis

资金

  1. U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Domestic Nuclear Detection Office [2015-DN-077-ARI092]
  2. DHS
  3. Defense Threat Reduction Agency via MAMA [HDTRA1-16-1-0026]
  4. College of Engineering, Health Sciences Center, Office of the Vice President for Research
  5. Utah Science Technology and Research (USTAR) Initiative of the State of Utah

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The analytical techniques typically utilized in a nuclear forensic investigation often provide limited information regarding the process history and production conditions of interdicted nuclear material. In this study, scanning electron microscopy (SEM) analysis of the surface morphology of amorphous-UO3 samples calcined at 250, 300, 350, 400, and 450 degrees C from uranyl peroxide was performed to determine if the morphology was indicative of the synthesis route and thermal history for the samples. Thermogravimetic analysis-mass spectrometry (TGA-MS) and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) were used to correlate transitions in the calcined material to morphological transformations. The high-resolution SEM images were processed using the Morphological Analysis for Material Attribution (MAMA) software. Morphological attributes, particle area and circularity, indicated significant trends as a result of calcination temperature. The quantitative morphological analysis was able to track the process of particle fragmentation and subsequent sintering as calcination temperature was increased. At the 90% confidence interval, with 1000 segmented particles, the use of Kolmogorov-Smirnov statistical comparisons allowed discernment between all calcination temperatures for the uranyl peroxide route.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据