4.7 Article

Carboxylated carbon carbon nanospheres as solid-phase extraction adsorbents for the determination of perfluorinated compounds in water samples by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry

期刊

TALANTA
卷 178, 期 -, 页码 129-133

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.talanta.2017.09.008

关键词

Perfluoroalkyl acids; Carboxylated carbon nanospheres; Solid-phase extraction; Environmental samples; Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21477068, 21777089]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province [ZR2015YL003]
  3. Key Research and Development Program of Shandong Province [2015GSF117011, 2017GSF17107]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This work demonstrates the extraction potential of carboxylated carbon nanospheres (CNSs-COON) for solid-phase extraction of perfluoroalkyl acids (PFAAs) for the first time. Six PFAAs, including perfluorohexanesulfonate (PFHxS), perfluoroheptanoic acid (PFHpA), perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA), perfluorooctanoic sulfonic (PFOS), perfluorononanoic acid (PFNA) and perfluorodecanoic acid (PFDA), were quantitatively adsorbed on a CNSs-COOH-packed cartridge; then, the PFAAs retained on the adsorbent were quantitatively eluted with an optimized volume of acetone (pH = 10). Finally, the desorbed PFAAs were determined by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Important relevant factors, such as the eluant and its volume, sample pH, amount of CNSs-COOH, sample flow rate and sample volume were optimized in detail. Under the optimized conditions, low limits of detection (0.01-1.2 ng L-1), wide linear range (0.50-200 ng L-1) and good repeatability (2.4-5.1%) and good reproducibility (3.7-8.8%) were obtained. The proposed method was applied to analyze the six PFAAs in real environmental water samples, and satisfactory results were achieved. All of these results showed that CNSs-COOH will be a good choice for the pre-concentration and analysis of target PFAAs at trace levels in environmental water samples in the future.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据