4.7 Article

Method development for comprehensive extraction and analysis of marine toxins: Liquid-liquid extraction and tandem liquid chromatography separations coupled to electrospray tandem mass spectrometry

期刊

TALANTA
卷 187, 期 -, 页码 302-307

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.talanta.2018.05.019

关键词

Toxin profiling; Dual column liquid chromatography; Hydrophilic interaction; Reverse phase; Triple quadrupole; Quadrupole time-of-flight

资金

  1. Department of Homeland Security, Science and Technology Directorate - Homeland Security Advanced Research Projects Agency - Chemical and Biological Division [HSHQPM16X00100]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A variety of toxins are produced by marine and freshwater microorganisms that present a threat to human health. These toxins have diverse chemical properties and specifically, a range of hydrophobicity. Methods for extraction and identification of these toxins are often geared toward specific classes of toxin depending on the sample type. There is a need for a general method of toxin extraction and identification for screening samples where the likely toxin content is not known a priori. We have applied a general method for metabolite extraction to toxin containing samples. This method was coupled with a simple dual liquid chromatography approach for separating a broad range of toxins. This liquid chromatography approach was coupled to triple quadrupole and quadrupole time-of-flight MS/MS platforms. The method was testing on a fish matrix for recovery of palytoxin as well as marine corals for detection of natural mixtures of palytoxin analogues. The recovery of palytoxin was found to produce a linear response (R-2 of 0.95) when spiked into the fish matrix with a limit of quantitation of 2.5 ng/mu L and recovery efficiency of 73% + /- 9%. The screening of corals revealed varying amount of palytoxin, and in one case, different palytoxin structural analogues. This demonstration illustrates the potential utility of this method for toxin extraction and detection.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据